<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The IMS Global Learning Consortium needs to loosen up!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pipwerks.com/journal/2008/01/30/the-ims-global-learning-consortium-needs-to-loosen-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pipwerks.com/journal/2008/01/30/the-ims-global-learning-consortium-needs-to-loosen-up/</link>
	<description>Philip Hutchison's technology journal, dedicated to exploring web technologies for website and e-learning development.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://pipwerks.com/journal/2008/01/30/the-ims-global-learning-consortium-needs-to-loosen-up/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pipwerks.com/journal/2008/01/30/the-ims-global-learning-consortium-needs-to-loosen-up/#comment-156</guid>
		<description>It's actually worse, Philip.

Unless you're a member of the Working Group, you don\'t have access to even the current draft.  You only get the last draft.  For QTI, that draft is at least a year or two old now.  For Common Cartridge, it's much much worse.

File under: Totally Lame!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s actually worse, Philip.</p>
<p>Unless you&#8217;re a member of the Working Group, you don\&#8217;t have access to even the current draft.  You only get the last draft.  For QTI, that draft is at least a year or two old now.  For Common Cartridge, it&#8217;s much much worse.</p>
<p>File under: Totally Lame!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
